If the second impeachment trial of Donald Trump were a play it would close after one performance. The plot is known, the outcome is certain, and the drama is contrived.

If it were a film, it might be called “Fifty Angry Senate Democrats” (apologies to “12 Angry Men”), or the 2003 film with a title that seems to fit this current dud, “Runaway Jury.”

What’s the point? The point is to allow Democratic senators to make speeches that seem high-minded, but in reality are low political posturing.

Recommended for you

Constitutional attorney John Whitehead is correct when he writes: “Impeaching Trump will accomplish very little, and it will not in any way improve the plight of the average American. It will only reinforce the spectacle and farce that have come to be synonymous with politics today.”

Trump’s lawyers used the phrase “unconstitutional political theater” in their filing requests that the Senate dismiss the one charge that the former president incited rioters who invaded the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6. Democrats fired back that Trump committed “the most grievous constitutional crime” ever committed by a U.S. president.

Somewhere Richard Nixon is smiling.

This is a show trial, designed to satisfy the left’s ravenous base that is out for blood and to teach anyone who thinks he (or she) can reform Washington to think again. The message? The Establishment will destroy you if anyone tries again to drain the swamp. Swamp creatures love the swamp. It is their life.

It is also a fundraising tool for both sides, which appears the only bipartisan behavior left in Washington.

Once Donald Trump is again acquitted, he is likely to resume public appearances, but perhaps he should consider waiting a while. Let the tension build, as in any good drama. Then, do not make it all about him. We’ve seen that play. Instead, comment on President Biden’s policies and broken promises. Quote Biden back to himself and tell the country how he is contributing to unemployment, higher gas prices, an economy that had begun to improve, and hypocrisy over executive orders.

Then, after some weeks pass and the media is going nuts because Trump has deprived them of ratings, hold some massive rallies. No name-calling, though. Stick to policies, not personalities.

In their filing to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers made these points:

1. The text and structure of the articles discussing impeachment do not grant to the Senate the authority over a former president.

2. The Constitution only gives the Senate jurisdiction over the resident, not the former president, of the United States.

3. The article of impeachment violates Mr. Trump’s First Amendment rights.

4. The Senate cannot disregard the First Amendment and the Supreme Court’s long-established free speech jurisprudence.

5. Mr. Trump as an elected official has First Amendment rights to freely engage in political speech.

6. Mr. Trump’s speech was fully protected by the First Amendment.

Lastly, Mr. Trump’s figurative use of the words “fight,” “fighting,” have been used by many, none are impeachable.

The filing concludes that by accusing the House of not granting Trump due process, that the article of impeachment is “deficient and can only result in his acquittal” and “fails to state an impeachable offense as a matter of law.”

A question already raised by legal scholars is whether a president who is no longer in office can be “impeached.”

The ultimate intent of Democrats seems to keep Trump from running again in 2024. They likely fear the power of the 73.6 million who voted for him, as they should, because he is a threat to career politicians and the Establishment.

This really bad theater would not even survive as a road show. It’s more like a bad circus act.

Support Local Journalism

Now, more than ever, the world needs trustworthy reporting—but good journalism isn’t free. Please support us by subscribing or making a contribution today.

Readers may email Cal Thomas at tcaeditors@tribpub.com. Look for Cal Thomas’ new book “America’s Expiration Date: The Fall of Empires and Superpowers and the Future of the United States” (HarperCollins/Zondervan).

(1) comment

PMA

Imagine if Trump were to testify! Think of the ratings that would bring! He must really be scared of committing perjury!

A lot of folks are picking on Trump's lawyer, saying he did a bad job. His client is literally on video but has refused to take the plea deal. What do you expect of him?

Did you know if you use a gun in a crime, you can't own a gun anymore?

If you hurt kids, you can't live by a school.

If you try to incite a coup over social media....

It's a natural consequence. He needs to be held accountable.

Welcome to the discussion.

Please log in, or sign up for a new, free account to read or post comments.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Support Local Journalism

Now, more than ever, the world needs trustworthy reporting—but good journalism isn’t free. Please support us by subscribing or making a contribution today.